Why Rust in the Linux Kernel? A Game-Changing Shift for Security and Stability

In partnership with

In a breakthrough that could reshape the future of Linux kernel development, November 30 marked a pivotal moment for Rust programming enthusiasts. The Linux 6.13 kernel development cycle quietly introduced a change that many thought impossible just a few years ago: full support for writing kernel drivers in Rust. This transformation came through updates to the "char/misc" module, alongside other significant changes to USB and staging branches.

The significance of this shift becomes clear through the words of Greg Kroah-Hartman, one of Linux kernel's most respected maintainers. In his merge announcement, he revealed both technical progress and a changing mindset within the kernel development community:

"The misc driver bindings and other Rust changes now enable misc driver development. This marks a significant milestone. These bindings should lead to increased Rust driver development. In the next merge window, we hope to include PCI and platform driver capabilities, which would allow most driver subsystems to work with — or at least test — Rust drivers. This achievement reflects the dedication of numerous developers. Congratulations to all involved! Your working code has proven that many of our initial concerns were unnecessary."

This announcement represents more than just technical progress—it signals a fundamental shift in how the Linux kernel community views modern programming languages. With Kroah-Hartman predicting an surge in upstream Rust drivers, we might be witnessing the beginning of a new era in kernel development, where the legendary stability of Linux meets the memory safety guarantees of Rust.

Kloudnative is committed to staying free for all our users. We kindly encourage you to explore our sponsors to help support us.

There’s a reason 400,000 professionals read this daily.

Join The AI Report, trusted by 400,000+ professionals at Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI. Get daily insights, tools, and strategies to master practical AI skills that drive results.

Sign up now for free and work smarter, not harder.

☝️ Support Kloudnative by clicking the link above to explore our sponsors!

The Rust Integration Journey: From Controversy to Breakthrough

In a significant development for the Linux kernel community, Miguel Ojeda, who leads the Rust for Linux project, submitted extensive Rust infrastructure and toolchain updates for Linux 6.13 on November 26. This substantial contribution added 3,000 lines of Rust code to the kernel overnight, marking a decisive step forward in the integration of Rust into Linux's core. With Linux 6.13-rc1's imminent release and the stable version expected by January's end, this kernel version is poised to be a landmark release.

Two critical developments have emerged that shed light on the project's evolution. First, Greg Kroah-Hartman, a veteran maintainer known for his initial skepticism, made a remarkable admission about being "wrong" regarding Rust's potential in kernel development. This acknowledgment, coming from a figure of his stature, represents a significant shift in the kernel community's perspective. Second, despite earlier setbacks in maintainer retention, the Rust integration has demonstrated remarkable resilience, progressing steadily without major disruptions.

The journey hasn't been without its challenges. In September, Microsoft engineer and Rust for Linux maintainer Wedson Almeida's departure highlighted the human cost of innovation. His resignation letter, citing burnout and frustration with "non-technical nonsense," exposed the complex dynamics within the kernel development community. This tension reflects a broader challenge: balancing technical innovation with community dynamics in open-source development.

The cultural divide between C and Rust developers remains a significant hurdle. Traditional C developers' resistance stems not just from technical concerns but from practical considerations about increased workload and the learning curve associated with Rust. Dan Williams from Intel's Linux Core Kernel Architecture team identified a crucial challenge: the expertise gap between seasoned kernel maintainers' mastery of C and their limited familiarity with Rust, particularly in code review and debugging processes.

Linus Torvalds, Linux's creator, has characterized the ongoing debate as reaching "religious war" proportions. His perspective remains measured: "We've been exploring this for years, so it's too early to draw conclusions. Even if it were to fail — which I don't support — failure is part of the learning process. I believe promoting Rust has its merits, but many people involved in the debate seem to disagree." This statement reflects both the complexity of the situation and the importance of maintaining a long-term view.

Miguel Ojeda's characterization of Almeida's resignation as "the darkest hour before the dawn" carries particular weight. "For me, it was certainly very difficult," Ojeda acknowledged, "But looking at it positively, this might indeed be the darkest hour before the dawn. I want to assure everyone that the project is continuing to move forward." His words suggest that the project's recent challenges might paradoxically signal its approaching maturity and broader acceptance within the kernel community.

The ongoing integration of Rust into Linux represents more than just a technical evolution; it's a case study in how open-source communities navigate significant technological transitions while managing human factors and institutional resistance to change.

From Pipe Dream to Reality: The Evolution of Rust in Linux

In a compelling keynote at RustConf 2024, Miguel Ojeda unfolded the remarkable transformation of what many once dismissed as an impossible dream: integrating Rust into the Linux kernel. This journey, spanning over a decade, reveals how persistence and collaborative effort can reshape the foundations of operating system development.

The story begins in 2013, during Rust's pre-1.0 era, when developers first explored the possibility of writing out-of-tree Rust modules for Linux. These early experiments, while modest in scope, planted the seeds for a far more ambitious vision. The Rust for Linux project emerged with a bold objective: to make Rust a first-class citizen within the Linux kernel, capable of handling every task that C could accomplish. This was no small ambition, considering that the most critical and widely-deployed drivers in Linux traditionally live in-tree, deeply integrated within the kernel's source code architecture.

A pivotal moment came in the summer of 2019 when Ojeda established the Rust for Linux GitHub organization. Though initially dormant, this move would prove prescient. The real catalyst arrived in July 2020, when Nick Desimone sparked a crucial discussion about Rust's potential role in kernel development. The response revealed an unexpected groundswell of support among kernel developers, many of whom had been quietly contemplating similar possibilities.

"At the time, it still felt like a daydream," Ojeda recalled during his keynote. Yet this "daydream" provided the gravitational center needed to unite developers who shared this vision. The submission of the first Rust pull request marked the beginning of a transformative period, as contributors from across the ecosystem began pooling their expertise. Their collective efforts culminated in a historic achievement: the integration of Rust support into Linux kernel version 6.1.

This milestone represents more than just a technical accomplishment. It demonstrates how the open-source community can successfully navigate the delicate balance between innovation and stability, challenging the conventional wisdom about what's possible in kernel development. The journey from experimental out-of-tree modules to mainline integration serves as a powerful reminder that today's "pipe dreams" can become tomorrow's standard practice through sustained collaboration and technical excellence.

The success of Rust in Linux also highlights a broader trend in system programming: the growing recognition that memory safety can be achieved without sacrificing performance or flexibility. This revelation is reshaping how developers approach operating system development, potentially influencing the next generation of kernel programming paradigms.

What is Rust for Linux?

Let me explain Rust for Linux by building up from the fundamentals to understand its significance in modern kernel development.

At its core, Rust for Linux is an ambitious project that aims to enable developers to write Linux kernel code using the Rust programming language, alongside the traditional C language. This may sound simple, but it represents a fundamental shift in how we think about kernel development.

To understand why this matters, let's first consider how the Linux kernel traditionally works. The kernel, written almost entirely in C since its creation in 1991, is the most critical part of a Linux operating system. It manages your computer's hardware, memory, and processes. C was chosen for its performance and low-level hardware control, but it comes with a significant drawback: it's relatively easy to introduce memory-related bugs that can crash systems or create security vulnerabilities.

This is where Rust enters the picture. Rust is a modern programming language that provides memory safety guarantees at compile time, meaning many common programming errors are caught before the code even runs. For instance, if you try to access memory incorrectly in Rust, the compiler will stop you, whereas in C, this might only be discovered when the program crashes in production.

The Rust for Linux project integrates Rust's safety features into kernel development while maintaining the high performance requirements that kernel code demands. This integration required solving complex technical challenges, such as:

1. Creating safe abstractions for kernel concepts without sacrificing performance

2. Ensuring Rust code can interact seamlessly with existing C code

3. Adapting Rust's memory management to work within the kernel's unique environment

4. Building new tools for kernel developers to work with Rust effectively

The project has evolved significantly since its early days in 2013. What started as experimental out-of-tree modules (code maintained separately from the main kernel) has grown into official support in the mainline kernel as of version 6.1. This means kernel developers can now write certain types of drivers and modules in Rust with full community support.

Think of it like renovating a massive, occupied building while keeping all services running. You need to add new features (Rust support) without disrupting existing operations (C code), all while maintaining the building's structural integrity (kernel stability). This is essentially what the Rust for Linux project has achieved.

The impact of this project extends beyond just technical improvements. It represents a cultural shift in the Linux kernel community, historically known for its conservative approach to change. The acceptance of Rust shows a willingness to embrace modern solutions to long-standing problems, particularly around security and reliability.

Looking ahead, Rust for Linux continues to expand its scope. Recent developments in Linux 6.13, as we discussed earlier, show how the project is steadily enabling more types of kernel drivers to be written in Rust. This gradual expansion helps ensure stability while moving toward a future where developers can choose the most appropriate language for their specific kernel development needs.

The project serves as a bridge between the battle-tested reliability of Linux and the modern safety features of Rust, potentially influencing how we think about operating system development for years to come. It's not just about adding a new programming language to the kernel; it's about evolving how we build reliable and secure operating system components in an increasingly complex computing environment.

Rust for Linux: Aiming for First-Class Rust Support in the Kernel.

The Rust for Linux project represents a transformative initiative in kernel development, aiming to elevate Rust to equal standing with C within the Linux kernel ecosystem. Rather than simply allowing Rust as an alternative language, the project envisions Rust becoming a fully integrated part of kernel development, capable of implementing any functionality that developers can currently create using C.

What makes this vision particularly bold is its scope. While some might be satisfied with enabling Rust for external, out-of-tree modules (components maintained separately from the main kernel), the project's aspirations reach much deeper into the kernel's architecture. The team envisions Rust being used to write critical in-tree components, including core APIs and fundamental subsystems. This means Rust would be trusted with the kernel's most essential functions, not just peripheral additions.

The project's reach extends beyond just kernel-space code. The team recognizes that a complete ecosystem requires support across different contexts, including host tools (programs that run on development machines) and user-space applications (programs that run on the finished system). This comprehensive approach ensures that Rust integration serves the entire Linux development pipeline.

Miguel Ojeda, who leads this ambitious endeavor, has consistently emphasized their unwavering focus on mainline kernel integration. This means getting Rust support merged into the official Linux kernel source tree, where it becomes part of the standard kernel distribution. His recent observation that "Rust is now in a strong position" reflects the significant progress made toward this goal, with Rust support already merged into the mainline kernel and continuing to expand its capabilities with each new release.

This evolution represents more than just adding another programming language to the kernel – it's about modernizing how we approach operating system development while maintaining the reliability and performance that Linux is known for. As the project continues to mature, it's increasingly showing how modern programming language features can enhance rather than compromise kernel development.

Conclusion

The journey of Rust in the Linux kernel represents a pivotal moment in operating system development, marking a shift from theoretical possibilities to practical implementation. What began as experimental work in 2013 has evolved into a robust, officially supported feature of the kernel, demonstrating how open-source communities can successfully navigate major technological transitions while preserving stability and performance.

The recent developments in Linux 6.13, particularly the expansion of the "char/misc" subsystem and the addition of 3,000 lines of Rust infrastructure code, signal a maturing integration. Greg Kroah-Hartman's public acknowledgment of his previous skepticism being "wrong" carries special weight, as it reflects a broader shift in the kernel development community's perspective on Rust's capabilities.

Despite facing challenges, including the resignation of key maintainers and what Linus Torvalds dubbed a "religious war" level of debate, the project has demonstrated remarkable resilience. Miguel Ojeda's characterization of recent difficulties as "the darkest hour before the dawn" proves particularly apt, as the project continues to gain momentum and expand its scope.

Looking ahead, the Rust for Linux project's vision of achieving first-class status within the kernel appears increasingly achievable. The steady progress in enabling more subsystems to work with Rust, combined with growing community acceptance, suggests that we're witnessing the early stages of a fundamental evolution in kernel development practices. This integration represents more than just adding a new programming language to the kernel – it's about modernizing how we approach operating system development while maintaining the reliability and security demands of kernel programming.

The success of this initiative may well influence the broader software industry, demonstrating how modern programming language features can enhance rather than compromise system-level software development. As we move forward, the Rust for Linux project stands as a testament to the power of collaborative open-source development and the potential for innovation even in the most established technical foundations of our computing infrastructure.